The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that appellant resisted an authorized arrest. Appellant's arrest for riot in the second degree was supported by probable cause since the arresting officer reasonably believed, based upon a radio transmission from a fellow officer, that appellant had engaged in violent and tumultuous conduct with a crowd of more than 15 people which hurled obscenities...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
