PEOPLE v. WANTON


256 A.D.2d 125 (1998)

683 N.Y.S.2d 203

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OMAR WANTON, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 10, 1998.


The court's Sandoval ruling was an appropriate exercise of discretion (see, People v Pavao, 59 N.Y.2d 282, 292). Contrary to defendant's argument, a fair reading of the record establishes that the People only elicited acts covered by the Sandoval ruling.

The court's curative instruction was sufficient to dispel the prejudicial effect of any error in admitting into evidence the amount of money and the denominations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases