LUSKER v. ZELMANOFF


248 A.D.2d 130 (1998)

669 N.Y.S.2d 534

Ronald Lusker, Appellant, v. March Zelmanoff, Respondent, et al., New York City Loft Board, Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 3, 1998


The complaint was properly dismissed on the ground that under the subject contract, defendant was obligated only to apply for a retail variance for her loft space, and, since plaintiff's proof admitted such application, there were no breach of contract issues for the jury to decide. That defendant's application sought residential as well as retail use of her space did not tend to show that she acted in bad faith, where there was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases