HEUER v. HEUER


152 N.J. 226 (1998)

704 A.2d 913

PATRICIA A. HEUER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GILBERT J. HEUER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 8, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale E. Console argued the cause for appellant (Ulrichsen, Amarel & Eory, attorneys).

James P. Yudes argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Yudes, attorney; Kevin M. Mazza, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

The core question raised in this appeal is what legal effect a successful attack on the validity of an ancient foreign divorce or putative divorce should have on claims after remarriage for alimony and/or equitable distribution when the party procuring the putative foreign decree did not knowingly commit any wrongful conduct. The trial court held that (1) defendant was not estopped from attacking the validity of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases