In view of defendant's explicit statement to the court on plaintiff's prior application seeking equitable distribution that he did not wish to challenge the validity of the judgment of divorce, and the court's reliance on that statement in determining that plaintiff is entitled to equitable distribution, defendant's motion to vacate the judgment of divorce was properly denied on the ground that the validity of the judgment had already been determined in the prior order and...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
