Defendant's contentions that the court's charge to the jury improperly endorsed the testimony of the undercover officer and included an unbalanced marshaling of the evidence are unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the charge, read as a whole, made clear to the jury that the court had no opinion on the evidence, and that the court fairly set forth the evidence in the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
