Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The People met their burden of establishing that the codefendant effectively consented to a police entry into the subject apartment by stepping back from the door after the officer explained his reason for seeking entry (People v Washington,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SABAT
255 A.D.2d 118 (1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 311
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carlos Sabat, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 5, 1998
November 5, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.