1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 251 A.D.2d
  5. 251 A.D.2d 121 (1998)
 

SILFVERCHIOLD v. HUT CAB CORP.

251 A.D.2d 121 (1998)

674 N.Y.S.2d 311

Irma Silfverchiold et al., Respondents, v. Hut Cab Corp. et al., Defendants, and New York City Transit Authority, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 16, 1998

While it was error to admit into evidence that portion of the police report containing respondent absent taxi driver's exculpatory statement regarding appellant's bus's involvement in the accident (see, Cover v Cohen, 61 N.Y.2d 261, 274; Sansevere v United Parcel Serv., 181 A.D.2d 521, 524), the error does not warrant reversal because the report was cumulative of other properly admitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases