ROJAS v. CUTSFORTH

No. B119159.

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 292 (1998)

67 Cal.App.4th 774

Shannon ROJAS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Craig Elwin CUTSFORTH, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

November 3, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Lester and Randolph M. Hammock, Encino, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Barry Bartholomew & Associates, Linda Bergus and Deborah A. Levine, Woodland Hills, for Defendant and Respondent.


GILBERT, Acting Presiding Justice.

Plaintiff mailed a complaint to the clerk for filing. The clerk returned the unfiled complaint by mail because a declaration for court assignment was not signed and the summons contained the address of the wrong branch of the court. In the meantime, the statute of limitations passed. The trial court denied plaintiffs request for a nunc pro tunc filing of the complaint and granted defendant summary judgment on the statute of limitations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases