U.S. v. URBAN

No. 97-7107.

140 F.3d 229 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America v. Frederick URBAN, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided March 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Gurganus, Jr. (argued), Office of United States Attorney, Scranton, PA, for Appellee.

Daniel I. Siegel (argued), Office of Federal Public Defender, Harrisburg, PA, for Appellant.

Before: MANSMANN and GREENBERG and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

ALARCON, Circuit Judge.

Frederick Urban appeals from the judgment of conviction for possession of an unregistered destructive device in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5861(d), and 5871. He contends that the district court committed prejudicial error in refusing to instruct the jury that the intent to use the components as a weapon is an element of the crime charged in the indictment. Urban also argues that the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases