The motion court, properly deferring to respondent's understanding of operational practices and expert evaluation of factual data pertinent to how to best achieve the cost savings purpose of the statute, correctly held that respondent's methodology for assigning cost savings targets to the local social services districts, such as petitioner, was not irrational (see, New York State Assn. of Counties v Axelrod,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF CITY OF NEW YORK v. WING
248 A.D.2d 116 (1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 805
In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, v. Brian J. Wing, as Acting Social Services Commissioner of The State of New York, et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 3, 1998
March 3, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
