The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence of homicidal intent, including defendant's shooting of the victim in the neck at close range.
The court properly exercised its discretion in limiting the cross-examination of one of the prosecution witnesses, where the court found that defendant had not established an offer of proof for the line of questioning, in that the alleged solicitation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.