IN RE CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.

No. 97-3145.

148 F.3d 214 (1998)

In re CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., Petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided May 22, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Cole (Argued), David Fernandez, Gregory Bevelock, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti LLP, Morristown, NJ, for Chambers Development Co., Inc.

Benjamin Clarke (Argued), Jonathan L. Williams, DeCotiis, Fitzpatrick & Gluck, Teaneck, NJ, for Passaic County Utilities Authority.

Before: STAPLETON and McKEE, Circuit Judges, and ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge.


OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEE, Circuit Judge.

Chambers Development Company, Inc., petitions for a writ of mandamus following our remand in Chambers Development Co., Inc., v. Passaic County Utilities Authority, 62 F.3d 582 (3d Cir.1995) ("Chambers I"). Chambers argues that mandamus is necessary because the district court ignored that mandate. We agree, and will therefore grant a writ of mandamus and remand this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases