CLAUS v. JOHN HANCOCK MUT. LIFE INS. CO.


254 A.D.2d 102 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 6

William Claus et al., Respondents, v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. A. J. Contracting Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants. A. J. Contracting Co., Inc., Sued Herein as A. J. Contracting Co., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. Hi Tech Data Floors, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant. A. J. Contracting Co., Inc., Sued Herein as A. J. Contracting Co., Second Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Second Fourth-Party Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 13, 1998


Under the unique circumstances presented, the court's vacatur of its prior judgment was a proper exercise of its inherent power (see, Ladd v Stevenson, 112 N.Y. 325, 331-332). Leave to amend the bill of particulars was appropriately granted by the court sua sponte (see, e.g., Zinn v Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 101 A.D.2d 860, 861), since it had inherent power...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases