DAYTON BAR ASSN. v. BUREN

No. 98-1729.

84 Ohio St.3d 271 (1998)

DAYTON BAR ASSOCIATION v. BUREN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Certo & Larson and Peter R. Certo, Jr., for relator.


Per Curiam.

We concur with the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Buren engaged in a continuing course of deceit, misrepresentation, and neglect of duty to his clients and the bankruptcy court. In addition, Buren has failed to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings. Under these circumstances, disbarment is the appropriate sanction. See, e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Churilla (1997), 78 Ohio St...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases