1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 251 A.D.2d
  5. 251 A.D.2d 104 (1998)
 

NINETEEN NEW YORK PROPS. LTD. P'SHIP v. UK JEE KIM

251 A.D.2d 104 (1998)

674 N.Y.S.2d 642

Nineteen New York Properties Limited Partnership, Appellant-Respondent, v. Uk Jee Kim et al., Defendants, and Abraham & Silver, Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 11, 1998

The IAS Court properly found that defendant-appellant law firm might be liable to plaintiff despite the absence of privity between the two, since "an attorney may be held liable for injuries sustained by a third party [i.e., a nonclient] as a consequence of the attorney's wrongful or improper exercise of authority, or where the attorney has committed fraud or collusion or a malicious or tortious act" (see, Singer v Whitman...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases