The evidence was legally sufficient to support the charges of sale of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell, based on the undercover officer's testimony of the conversation between himself and defendant, along with defendant's display of crack cocaine to the officer, and the eventual recovery of the crack cocaine from defendant's person (see, Penal Law § 220.00 [1]; People v Boyd,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.