A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's findings that while plaintiff showed defendant Kaufman the property, introduced Kaufman to the seller and arranged meetings between them, and provided Kaufman with a sample draft contract of sale, Kaufman never made an offer to purchase the property due to lack of necessary financial resources, and that Kaufman's ultimate participation in the purchase as a 10% partner in the purchasing entity was due to an introduction...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
