The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury had ample basis upon which to reject defendant's agency defense. Defendant, who had no prior contact with the undercover officer, exhibited behavior before, during and after the sale, that was consistent with that of a "steerer" in a drug operation (see, People v Herring,
Since the ineffective...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.