BAXT v. LILOIA


155 N.J. 190 (1998)

714 A.2d 271

SHERWOOD BAXT AND SAIDA BAXT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GERALD A. LILOIA AND ANTHONY J. SYLVESTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 17, 1998.

Reconsideration Denied October 6, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helen Davis Chaitman, argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Ross & Hardies, attorneys; Ms. Chaitman, George B. Gelman, of counsel).

Peter N. Perretti, Jr., argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys; Mr. Perretti and Michael Cole, of counsel; Harold L. Kofman, on the brief).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by PORITZ, C.J.

In this appeal, plaintiffs have asked the Court to recognize a new cause of action premised upon a breach of the Rules of Professional Conduct ("RPCs" or "Rules") adopted by the Court for the governance of the legal profession. More specifically, plaintiffs urge us to permit this new claim to be brought against attorneys who represent an adversary of the claimant. A majority of the Appellate Division declined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases