PEOPLE v. ANONYMOUS


256 A.D.2d 88 (1998)

682 N.Y.S.2d 572

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANONYMOUS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided December 8, 1998.


By failing to raise it with specificity in his motion to withdraw his plea, defendant did not preserve his current challenge to his plea (People v James, 239 A.D.2d 243, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 906), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that defendant was sufficiently warned of the consequences of absconding or committing new crimes (see, People v Velez,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases