STATE EX REL. GROVE v. NADEL

No. 98-1478.

84 Ohio St.3d 252 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. GROVE, APPELLANT, v. NADEL, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Earl Grove, pro se.

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald W. Springman, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Grove asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting Judge Nadel's second motion to dismiss because it was contrary to this court's mandate and his trial court transmitted the wrong transcript in his appeal of right. For the following reasons, however, Grove's claims lack merit.

First, the court correctly dismissed Grove's procedendo action on remand from this court because Judge Nadel had already performed the requested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases