The respondent was served with a petition dated June 19, 1996, which contained six charges of professional misconduct against him. In his answer, as amended, the respondent denied most of the factual allegations contained in the petition and denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. After a hearing, the Special Referee sustained Charge Six only. The Grievance Committee now moves to confirm the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.