CITY OF LANCASTER v. FAIRFIELD CTY. BUDGET COMM.

No. 97-1814.

83 Ohio St.3d 242 (1998)

CITY OF LANCASTER, APPELLANT, v. FAIRFIELD COUNTY BUDGET COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Varanese, for appellant.

Roy E. Hart, Fairfield County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees.


COOK, J.

Lancaster is convinced that the General Assembly could not have intended that Columbus, with far fewer citizens to be affected by a decision relating to Fairfield County than Lancaster, have such a significant say in that county's financial affairs. But, because the words used by the General Assembly are only understandable as disfavoring Lancaster's position, this court must apply those words without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases