Although defendant insurer made a sufficient showing that the insured premises had at the time of plaintiff's loss been "vacant or unoccupied beyond a period of sixty consecutive days" and, having established that circumstance, concomitantly made out a prima facie case for the applicability of the exclusion upon which it premised its disclaimer of coverage (see, Northville Indus. Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
438 MANHATTAN AVE., INC. v. INS. CO. OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
251 A.D.2d 71 (1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 687
438 Manhattan Avenue, Inc., Respondent, v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 9, 1998
June 9, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
