The jury's rejection of the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the jury's evaluation of conflicting expert testimony.
The court's examination of the defense expert was not so excessive as to warrant reversal (see, People v Moulton,
Defendant's contention that his right to a unanimous verdict was violated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
