MEHLMAN v. MOBIL OIL CORP.


153 N.J. 163 (1998)

707 A.2d 1000

DR. MYRON A. MEHLMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND F.M. CUNNINGHAM, C.R. MACKERER, IRIS KAPLAN, NORMAN MORGAN AND K.A. TORTORIELLO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, v. PRINCETON SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING CO., INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 26, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Brennan, III, argued the cause for appellants (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, attorneys).

Neil M. Mullin, argued the cause for respondent (Smith Mullin, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

The primary question presented by this appeal is whether the Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -8 (CEPA), protects an employee from retaliatory action taken against him in New Jersey by his New Jersey employer because the employee objected to a practice that he reasonably believed was incompatible with a clear mandate of public policy designed to protect the public health and safety...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases