PATTON v. AMBLO


314 N.J. Super. 1 (1998)

KIM PATTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WENDY AMBLO, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 26, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Galex argued the cause for appellant (Galex, Tortoreti & Tomes, attorneys for appellant; Mr. Galex, on the brief).

Daniel J. Pomeroy argued the cause for respondent (Mortenson & Pomeroy, attorneys for respondent; Mr. Pomeroy, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges NEWMAN, COLLESTER and LESEMANN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by NEWMAN, J.A.D.

This medical malpractice action stems from injuries suffered by plaintiff Kim Patton when her stomach was punctured during a laparoscopic tubal ligation performed by defendant Dr. Wendy Amblo. After a four-day trial, a jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant. On appeal, plaintiff raises three issues: (l) the trial judge inappropriately charged the jury with the "exercise of judgment" instruction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases