The IAS Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by denying defendants' request for sanctions and attorneys' fees, since there was a basis in the record for the plaintiff's initial motion seeking disqualification of defendants' counsel, and since the record did not indicate that plaintiff's counsel knew or should have known that the allegations underlying his disqualification motion were false (see, Golden v Barker,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MINICHIELLO v. SUPPER CLUB
256 A.D.2d 59 (1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 850
STEVEN MINICHIELLO, Respondent, v. SUPPER CLUB et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 3, 1998.
Decided December 3, 1998.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.