Defendant's request for a charge on the evaluation of a wholly circumstantial case was properly denied. The evidence of defendant's guilt as an accomplice was both direct and circumstantial, a situation which eliminates any necessity for a circumstantial evidence charge (People v Roldan,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DEJESUS
256 A.D.2d 59 (1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 33
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANNY DEJESUS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided December 3, 1998.
Decided December 3, 1998.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.