Given the nature of the contractual breach asserted by plaintiff and the circumstance that defendant was in default for having failed to answer the complaint, Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in directing an expedited trial. The procedure employed by the court was, moreover, one in which defendant at the time acquiesced. Furthermore, there was no violation of due process when the Referee clarified the scope of the referral with the referring court. Finally...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
