U.S. v. RUDOLPH

No. 96-5726.

137 F.3d 173 (1998)

UNITED STATES of America v. Deandre RUDOLPH, a/k/a "Rudy" Deandre Rudolph, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided February 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter V. Ryan (Argued), West Orange, NJ, for Appellant.

Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, Kevin McNulty, Allan Tananbaum (Argued), Office of United States Attorney, Newark, NJ, for Appellee.

Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges


OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I.

Deandre Rudolph, who pled guilty to bribery and sale of government property, appeals his sentence on the grounds that the district court (1) improperly enhanced his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2C1.1(b)(1), and (2) improperly failed to group the two convictions under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2. Because there was no trial, most of the relevant facts were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases