PEOPLE v. HICKS


254 A.D.2d 48 (1998)

679 N.Y.S.2d 277

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin Hicks, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 6, 1998


There is no merit to defendant's claim that his explicit waiver of his right to appeal the suppression ruling was "coerced to conceal error" (People v Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 11). Defendant's argument misconstrues the concept of "concealment" addressed in Seaberg. As the Court of Appeals subsequently explained in People v Holman (89 N.Y.2d 876, 878), "Avoidance of an appeal of openly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases