In light of petitioner's admissions at his disciplinary hearing that he participated in what he knew to be an illegal search, seizure and arrest, and in light of his consistent pattern of lying to superior officers, prosecutors and other officials concerning the circumstances of that arrest, the IAS Court properly rejected petitioner's claim that the penalty of termination imposed by respondent was shockingly unfair and disproportionate to the committed misconduct (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
