PEOPLE v. SAINZ


254 A.D.2d 45 (1998)

680 N.Y.S.2d 198

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Oscar Sainz, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

October 6, 1998


Defendant's contention that his attorney was ineffective for failing to advise him that the court was not bound to impose the sentence that the People had agreed to recommend would require a CPL 440.10 motion because it is based on facts dehors the record (People v Brown, 45 N.Y.2d 852; see also, People v Ramos, 63 N.Y.2d 640). On the existing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases