1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 75 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 (1998)
 

MAXWELL v. BEVERLY

Nos. A073149, A074535.

75 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 (1998)

Sharon MAXWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Sharon MAXWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEVERLY ENTERPRISES-CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

Review Granted September 16, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Stephen F. Danz, Stephen F. Danz, Sherman Oaks, and David A. Lerman, Berkeley, Pine & Pine, Norman Pine and Beverly Tillett Pine, Encino, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason, Henry D. Lederman, Walnut Creek, David S. Durham and Arthur M. Eidelhoch, San Francisco, for Defendant and Appellant and for Defendant and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication*

DOSSEE, Associate Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Beverly Enterprises-California, Inc., (hereafter "Beverly") a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Beverly Enterprises, Inc., appeals from an adverse judgment in a wrongful termination case.1 It argues that its employees were not "managing agents" for purposes of an award of punitive damages

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases