1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 247 Conn.
  5. 247 Conn. 48 (1998)
 

BEVERLY HILLS CONCEPTS, INC. v. SCHATZ & SCHATZ, RIBICOFF & KOTKIN

(SC 15730)

247 Conn. 48 (1998)

BEVERLY HILLS CONCEPTS, INC., ET AL. v. SCHATZ AND SCHATZ, RIBICOFF AND KOTKIN ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released September 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark R. Kravitz, with whom were Daniel J. Klau and William J. Doyle, for the appellants-appellees (defendants).

Jeffrey J. Tinley, with whom, on the brief, were Steven D. Ecker and Paula A. Platano, for the appellee-appellant (named plaintiff).

Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Peters and E. O'Connell, JS.

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is the proper method for calculating damages for the destruction of a nascent business. We conclude that: (1) unestablished enterprises must be permitted to recover damages for legal malpractice and that a flexible approach in determining those damages generally is appropriate; (2) lost profits for a reasonable period of time may serve as an appropriate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases