Reading defendant's omnibus motion and his supplemental motion as a whole, we find that defense counsel asserted, on information and belief, based on conversations he had had with defendant, sufficient facts to warrant a Mapp hearing (see, People v Collazo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MORALES
254 A.D.2d 33 (1998)
678 N.Y.S.2d 262
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antonio Morales, Also Known as Francisco Malave, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 1, 1998
October 1, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.