NIAGARA MOHAWK v. ASSESSOR


92 N.Y.2d 192 (1998)

699 N.E.2d 899

677 N.Y.S.2d 275

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Appellant, v. Assessor of Town of Geddes et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 7, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helm, Shapiro, Anito & McCale, P. C., Albany (Lawrence A. Zimmerman and Mark D. Lansing of counsel), for appellant.

Setright, Ciabotti & Longstreet, Syracuse (Victor J. Ciabotti of counsel), for respondents.

Lewis & Greer, P. C., Poughkeepsie (Michael J. Englert of counsel), for Association of Towns of the State of New York, amicus curiae.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, LEVINE and CIPARICK concur; Judge WESLEY taking no part.


SMITH, J.

The issue here is whether petitioner has presented substantial evidence that its properties, which respondent Town of Geddes categorized as specialties, were overvalued. We hold substantial evidence exists that the four challenged properties were not specialties as a matter of law, and thus petitioner sufficiently overcame the presumption that respondents' assessments were valid for the tax years at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases