The respondent was served with a petition dated October 25, 1996, which contained six charges of professional misconduct. In his answer, the respondent admitted most of the factual allegations contained in the petition, but denied that he was guilty of any professional misconduct. After a hearing, the petitioner withdrew Charge Two, and the Special Referee sustained Charges Three, Four, and Five. The Special Referee...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.