1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 251 A.D.2d
  5. 251 A.D.2d 23 (1998)
 

QUALITY JEWELRY CO., INC. v. SPITZER

251 A.D.2d 23 (1998)

673 N.Y.S.2d 145

Quality Jewelry Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Asher Spitzer et al., Defendants. Matarazzo Blumberg & Associates, P. C., et al., Respondents; Iser Abramovitz, Appellant. Matarazzo Blumberg & Associates, P. C., et al., Respondents, v. Iser Abramovitz et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 2, 1998

We see no reason to disturb the court's determination that the representational relationship between respondent law firm and appellants was terminated by reason of irreconcilable differences and not "for cause". Although appellants contend that a full evidentiary hearing was necessary to the proper adjudication of this issue, appellants failed to raise any issue warranting such a hearing. Moreover, the motion court, having presided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases