Defendant failed to preserve his current challenges to his guilty plea since he did not move to withdraw his plea and we decline to review these claims in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find from our examination of the record that defendant voluntarily entered his plea and that the allocution was sufficient in all respects despite the intemperate remarks of the court (see, People v Fiumefreddo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SANTIAGO
254 A.D.2d 14 (1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 922
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Franklin Santiago, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 1, 1998
October 1, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
