1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 24 F.Supp.2d
  5. 24 F.Supp.2d 243 (1998)
 

HIJECK v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Nos. 396CV1171(JBA), 396CV1605(JBA), 396CV1928(JBA), 396CV2116(JBA), 396CV2117(JBA) and 396CV2118(JBA).

24 F.Supp.2d 243 (1998)

Walter HIJECK v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. Helen TINO v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. Gordon B. TIZIANI v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. John K. ALDRICH v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. Frank W. GRACEWSKI v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. John J. McMANUS v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 25, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Moukawsher, Moukawsher & Walsh, Groton, Michael Joseph Walsh, Moukawsher & Walsh, Hartford, CT, for plaintiffs.

Albert Zakarian, Esther R. Aronson, Glenn William Dowd, Sarah C. Baskin, Peter J. Duffy, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, CT, for defendant.

RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ARTERTON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs, Walter Hijeck, Helen Tino, Gordon B. Tiziani, John K. Aldrich, Frank W. Gracewski, and John J. McManus are employees who retired from United Technologies Corporation's ("UTC") Hamilton Standard and Pratt & Whitney divisions between 1990 and 1991. In their complaints, which allege identical causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases