Richard RIDER et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants,
CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 6, 1998.
August 6, 1998.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Carl Fabian, San Diego, Eric Norby and Lewis A. Wenzell for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
John W. Witt and Casey G. Gwinn, City Attorneys, Leslie J. Girard and Deborah L. Berger, Deputy City Attorneys, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Charles A. Bird, Thomas A. May, San Diego, Seltzer, Caplan, Wilkins & McMahon, Julia P. Dubick and Virginia C. Pearson, San Diego, for Defendants and Respondents.
O'Melveny & Myers, Richard M. Jones, Brian S. Currey, Kenneth R. O'Rourke, Los Angeles, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Paul A. Webber, Robert E. Freitas, Los Angeles, and W. Douglas Kari as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
Supreme Court of California.
In this case, we consider the validity of a financing plan under which a joint powers agency will issue bonds, use the bond proceeds to construct a capital improvement, and lease that improvement to a city. We conclude that the voter approval requirements that would apply if the city issued the bonds do not, by their terms, apply to the debts of a joint powers agency, and the city's obligation to make rent payments to the joint powers agency does not...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.