OFFICE OF CONSUMER COUNSEL v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC UTILITY CONTROL

(SC 15823)

246 Conn. 18 (1998)

OFFICE OF CONSUMER COUNSEL v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITY CONTROL ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Officially released August 4, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce C. Johnson, with whom, on the brief, was Guy R. Mazza, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Tatiana D. Sypko-Eirmann, assistant attorney general, with whom were Robert S. Golden, Jr., assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant).

Robert P. Knickerbocker, Jr., with whom were Cynthia Brodhead and, on the brief, Kenneth H. Eagle and Frederic L. Klein, for the appellee (defendant Connecticut Light and Power Company).

Callahan, C. J., and Berdon, Katz, Palmer and McDonald, Js.


Opinion

CALLAHAN, C. J.

The sole issue raised in this administrative appeal is the proper interpretation of Public Acts 1995, No. 95-43, § 1 (c), now codified as General Statutes § 16-19b (c),1 which authorizes the department of public utility control to approve an energy adjustment clause for an electric company to be superimposed on the company's base rate schedule...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases