WILDENSTEIN v. WILDENSTEIN


249 A.D.2d 12 (1998)

671 N.Y.S.2d 227

Jocelyne Wildenstein, Respondent, v. Alec N. Wildenstein, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

April 2, 1998


The durational residency requirement of Domestic Relations Law § 230 is satisfied herein by evidence that, for two years prior to commencement of the action, the parties regularly returned, as part of their international life style, to reside in the New York County home where they raised their two children, and that there was no other place to which they returned so frequently or with such regularity (see, Wittich v Wittich, 210 A.D.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases