The court's verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence establishing defendant's intentional participation in the sale, and refuting the agency defense, including evidence that defendant, in conjunction with steering an undercover officer to the seller for the purchase of heroin, exercised exclusive control over public access to the seller and acted as a lookout by standing in the doorway of a building...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
