STATE EX REL. FLAGNER v. ARKO

No. 98-487.

83 Ohio St.3d 176 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. FLAGNER, APPELLANT, v. ARKO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hbrandon Flagner, pro se.

Michael G. Ciaravino & Associates and Michael G. Ciaravino, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

Flagner asserts that the court of appeals erred in denying the writ of mandamus. For the following reasons, however, we find Flagner's assertion meritless and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Initially, Detective Arko had no duty under Crim.R. 16 to provide the requested evidence. Crim.R. 16(B) requires the prosecuting attorney, not a police detective, to provide certain evidence in criminal discovery. Crim.R. 16...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases