Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the presentment agency, we find that in each case it sufficiently supports the fact-finding determinations. Moreover, neither finding was against the weight of the evidence. The courts properly inferred that appellant intended to commit robbery and grand larceny during both of the incidents and that he took affirmative steps toward achieving those goals (see, People v Bracey,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF R.
254 A.D.2d 4 (1998)
677 N.Y.S.2d 921
In the Matter of Victor R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. In the Matter of Victor R., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 1, 1998
October 1, 1998
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.