1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 83 Ohio
  5. 83 Ohio St.3d 169 (1998)
 

STATE EX REL. BURCHFIELD v. PRINTECH CORP.

No. 95-2505.

83 Ohio St.3d 169 (1998)

THE STATE EX REL. BURCHFIELD, APPELLANT, v. PRINTECH CORPORATION; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 23, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., Daniel D. Connor and Kenneth S. Hafenstein, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Miltina A. Gavia, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

A specific safety requirement must prescribe "specific and definite requirements or standards of conduct * * * which are of a character plainly to apprise an employer of his legal obligation towards his employees." State ex rel. Trydle v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 32 Ohio St.2d 257, 61 O.O.2d 488, 291 N.E.2d 748, paragraph one of the syllabus. Moreover, because a VSSR is an employer penalty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases